<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American College of Assisted Reproduction &#38; Adoption Lawyers (ACARAL) &#187; Ethics | ACARAL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acaral.org/blog/category/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acaral.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:22:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The “Lightly Regulated” US Fertility Industry:  The Myth Continues</title>
		<link>http://acaral.org/blog/the-%e2%80%9clightly-regulated%e2%80%9d-us-fertility-industry-the-myth-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://acaral.org/blog/the-%e2%80%9clightly-regulated%e2%80%9d-us-fertility-industry-the-myth-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sanford Benardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Assisted Reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egg Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrogacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acaral.org/blog/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[﻿﻿﻿Countries – indeed, whole regions of the world – which disallow or severely curtail IVF and/or gamete donation are often mistakenly called “highly regulated” environments. Heavy restrictions, usually with religious underpinnings or simply borne out of a failure to think progressively, hardly constitute regulation. They are more accurately described as prohibitions. Compared with places like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>﻿﻿﻿Countries – indeed, whole regions of the world – which disallow or severely curtail IVF and/or gamete donation are often mistakenly called “highly regulated” environments.  Heavy restrictions, usually with religious underpinnings or simply borne out of a failure to think progressively, hardly constitute regulation.  They are more accurately described as prohibitions.</p>
<p>Compared with places like Italy, the Middle East, England and Canada (specifically with regard to paid gamete donation in these last two countries), the fertility industry in the United States has been likened to the “Wild West” – a loosely regulated landscape where anything is possible.  This is just not true.  The FDA, the mandates of various states vis a vis gamete donation (New York is prominent here), the ASRM (even though it oversteps its bounds with attempts at economic regulation) and the internal administrative policies of many responsible IVF clinics prove that significant regulation exists to shape appropriate conduct and safeguard the health of all IVF patients and egg/sperm donors.  I think that we need better and more refined regulation so that we cut the lag time between scientific advancement and policies designed to effectively govern practice.  But little regulation in the US?  Not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acaral.org/blog/the-%e2%80%9clightly-regulated%e2%80%9d-us-fertility-industry-the-myth-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Egg donation, stem cell research and ethical compensation</title>
		<link>http://acaral.org/blog/egg-donation-stem-cell-research/</link>
		<comments>http://acaral.org/blog/egg-donation-stem-cell-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sanford Benardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Egg Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noteworthy Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial surrogacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[donating eggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg donor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embryonic stem cell research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrogacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acaral.org/blog/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interesting twist, New York has now determined that it is ethically acceptable to compensate women for donating eggs to be used for clinical research.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay egg donors for contributing to stem cell research?  New York became the first in the United States to say yes:</p>
<blockquote><p>New York has become the first and only state to opt to pay women for eggs donated for human embryonic stem cell research. The Empire State Stem Cell Board (ESSCB), which oversees New York&#8217;s $600 million stem cell research program that was launched last year, came to the decision last week (June 11) following &#8220;extensive deliberation&#8221; from its ethics committee. (&#8220;<a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55766/" target="_blank">NY to pay for eggs for research</a>,&#8221; TheScientist.com, June 17, 2009)</p></blockquote>
<p>In an interesting twist, New York &#8211; a state that forbids compensated surrogacy &#8211; has now determined that it is acceptable (ethically) to compensate women for donating eggs to be used for clinical research.  Perhaps the distinction is that legislators (I&#8217;d venture to guess from upstate territories) were behind New York&#8217;s statutory prohibition on commercial surrogacy, while more enlightened scientists and other interdisciplinary professionals who make up an ethical review board are behind this latest ruling.  ASRM compensation and procurement guidelines will continue to control.  A pioneering move sure to generate controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acaral.org/blog/egg-donation-stem-cell-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

